Trans, Fatty, Acidic

Month

July 2011

That's it, I'm installing Tumblr Savior

I need some way to crack down on all these het Kanaya ships popping up.

How you can be a ‘fan’ of a character while erasing their queerness to fit your neat het shipping chart is beyond me.

I wonder if I should just block all content with Gamzee in it…

When seeing other people talking about this same issue, I’ve seen a lot of the same two obnoxious arguments: that all trolls are effectively (pan)sexual anyway, and that since we put canonically straight characters in queer ships, putting a canonical lesbian in a straight ship is fine too.

For the first part: simply, unequivocally wrong. Hussie actually answered a question about this on Formspring: the Word of God is that, “From a human perspective, she’s an unmistakably gay character.” Trolls don’t have words for sexual orientation, since they’re practically all what we would call pansexual; but some, like Kanaya, aren’t.

For the second: this seems so simple at first, so straightforward - if making a straight character queer is okay, then making a queer character straight is okay too, right? No. They aren’t equivalent actions at all, because they’re not taking place on an even playing field.

Our culture’s perception is a sea of heteronormativity. From our earliest moments in childhood, all the things we take in - the fairy tales we’re told, the stories we read, the magazines we read, the movies and shows we watch, the songs we listen to, even the advertisements all around us - are completely inundated with images of heterosexual couples and heterosexual romance and heterosexual love and heterosexual desires and heterosexual sex. It surrounds every image, value, and thought instilled in us about romance. Comparatively, anything remotely queer is stifled. It’s ‘unfit’ for those same children reading stories steeped in hetero romance. It’s taken out of libraries. It’s a taboo. In the extremely rare cases we get any presence, it’s always, ALWAYS, an anomaly - and usually paired with mockery and disgust, to boot.

As such, queering the stories around us, reading our own queer desires and dreams and loves into the stories and characters permeating our culture, is a long-standing act of survival. It’s taking back a tiny, vestigial part of the hetero culture engulfing us and making it OURS. Now, when you do the reverse? When you take a rare canonically queer character and make them straight, it is not the same - you are taking back what tiny gains we’ve made and erasing them, twisting them to fit back into your complete cultural dominance.

No, it’s not the same. And it’s n0t 0k.

Addendum: You might be wondering, why am I talking about this as though a character in a het relationship can’t be queer, which appears to be excluding bi/pan/queer/fluid identities. In context of the canon, though, it’s perfectly sensible - if you look at all 16 of the player characters, TWELVE of which are from a pansexual society, equally split between male and female genders, there has been loads of sexual tension all around. And yet, only four have EVER explicitly expressed (flushed/caliginous) same-sex attractions: Kanaya, Karkat, Vriska, and Eridan, and NONE of these feelings were requited. If you even throw in the kids’ guardians, the Exiles, the Felt, and the games’ monarchs, we find yet more clearly expressed female/male attractions, but no more same-sex ones.

It’s particularly clear when we look at the trolls that there is no shortage of ostensibly queer/bi/pan characters expressing male/female attractions - take Equius and Aradia, for example, or Vriska, who has clearly shown flushed interest in both a male and a female character.

So, yes, pairing Kanaya with male characters *is* still a way of hiding away the queer attractions, of making all the trolls appear nice and straight and comfortably heteronormative. It’s erasure, plain and simple.

Jun 30, 201142 notes
#heteronormativity #erasure #kanaya #Homestuck #fandom #sometimes imp writes

June 2011

Impromptu One-Dyke Dance Party: stfuconservatives: whiporwill: An Overview of the Same-Sex Marriage... → impromptuonedykedanceparty.tumblr.com

thatswhatzhesaid:

impromptuonedykedanceparty:

stfuconservatives:

whiporwill:

An Overview of the Same-Sex Marriage Debate (click to enlarge)

Comically accurate. Most of the arguments I’ve been hearing since NY passed marriage equality are on the far right-hand part of the chart.

-Joe

[Redacted image, a flowchart of common…

I read through the chart before your comment ^.^ I would have been very shocked if you missed that one! It pissed me off too <.< ugh cisLGB I was also bothered by the fact that polygamy was left as an argument that has no counter. and someone who is heterosexual can use it against gay marriage. I was getting nasty monogamous vibes from it at least *shudders* maybe I read into it wrong…

Augh, you’re right, I missed that! (Going on memory from about a year ago)

To play privilege-denying-monoamorist’s advocate for a second, that’s listed as an argument the anti-gays pull out - which is accurate, they do often say things about marriage equality for same-sex couples would lead to legal polygamy.

Now then… the response to that scaremongering SHOULD be “so?” or “yes, we should be fighting for that as well,” but of course, you’ll never see the HRC type agreeing to something like that, and of course said HRC types never object to people lumping in polyamory with bestiality and child molestation. *sigh*

*contemplates adding ‘polyamorous’ to that cloud of descriptors in my sidebar*

ETA: Wow, speak of the devil: 

The only argument that makes ANY sort of logical sense is the slippery slope to polygamy one. I can’t think of a good counter-argument against it. 

- ivehadtoomuchtothink

~Yep, using us as a thing to be feared is such a logical argument! Because, you know, hatred and disgust for polyamory is just a Natural Fact.~

Jun 29, 2011345 notes
#(HRC, we're NOT your fans) #anti-poly #anti-trans #sometimes imp writes
When someone capitalizes every word of a sentence

n-nani:

OMG IT’S KANAYA

Every Time

Jun 28, 20115 notes

stfuconservatives:

whiporwill:

An Overview of the Same-Sex Marriage Debate (click to enlarge)

Comically accurate. Most of the arguments I’ve been hearing since NY passed marriage equality are on the far right-hand part of the chart.

-Joe

[Redacted image, a flowchart of common arguments for and against marriage rights for same-sex couples. One branch counters con’s “Heterosexual Marriage is Sacred” point with pro’s “Las Vegas Transexual Elvis Taco Stand Wedding Followed 2 Days Later By Divorce”]

Very accurate and thorough. They even included a point where the cisLGB pillory trans folks as a sign of how fake and awful and detestable something is.

Ugh, I don’t even.

Jun 28, 2011345 notes
#I remember having to patiently explain this to cis people back then too #I remember this flowchart #cisfail #let's see how much privilege denying will happen here #(THAT WAS NOT A REQUEST FOR A DEMONSTRATION THOUGH KKTHX &lt;3 )
“I sometimes visualize the ongoing cycle of racism as a moving walkway at the airport. Active racist behavior is equivalent to walking fast on the conveyor belt. The person engaged in active racist behaviour has identified with the ideology of White supremacy and is moving with it. Passive racist behaviour is equivalent to standing still on the walk way. No overt effort is being made, but the conveyor belt moves the bystanders along to the same destination as those who are actively walking. Some of the bystanders may feel the motion of the conveyor belt, see the active racists ahead of them, and choose to turn around, unwilling to go to the same destination as the White supremacists. But unless they are walking actively in the opposite direction at a speed faster than the conveyor belt - unless they are actively antiracist - they will find themselves carried along with the others.” —

Beverly Daniel Tatum, an excerpt from “Why are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?” (via pnasty)

this is a really good analogy.

(via sexxxisbeautiful)

Yes, brilliant analogy. It can be applied to any systematic oppression, the status quo encourages you to go along for the ride. Keeping people down (or letting others keep them down) is easy, fixing the system, working against it, that requires true effort.

-Joe

(via stfuconservatives)

Jun 26, 2011759 notes
Ask me how many fucks I give about cis people's worthless theories about trans people.

genderbitch:

Ask. Go on. I’m sure you’re curious.

Jun 17, 201151 notes
“According to the May Nielson ratings, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart beat the entire Fox News network in terms of total viewers. Stewart averaged 2.3 million viewers, while the Fox News prime time and day time line up averaged 1.85 million viewers.” —

Jon Stewart’s Ratings Are Now Higher Than All Of Fox News

Know hope.

(via danielholter)

The best news I’ve heard all week.

(via stfuconservatives)

Jun 5, 2011593 notes
#This is good!
GSM or LGBT? (SPOILER WARNING: GSM!) → venatus.tumblr.com

amydentata:

stifledthoughts:

jizzykram:

petitandrogyne:

deadlegsonwheels:

GSM stands for Gender & Sexuality Minority

I prefer it to LGBT because GSM is more inclusive

Basically any gender or sexuality that isn’t considered heteronormative could go under GSM. As well as lgbt the following genders/sexualities could go under GSM.

This is not a limit just all i can think of so far. Any others let me know.

  • Genderqueer
  • Genderfuck
  • Genderless
  • Bigender
  • Third gender
  • Pangender
  • Androgynous
  • Asexual
  • Demisexual
  • Polysexual
  • Polyamorous
  • Pomosexual
  • Pansexual
  • Genderfluid

WOWZA

I HAVEN’T BEEN THIS PLEASED SINCE I DISCOVERED GENDER NEUTRAL PRONOUNS

awesome!

I fucking like this

I rather like it as well.

This is good!

Jun 2, 2011916 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December