omfgjo:

cijithegeek:

kyssthis16:

yeezysdisciple:

youngbertreynolds:

thempress:



Maybe put it on a canvas instead of someone’s property, and we can all be happy.

who paying for these canvases or the art programs so these kids can have that? Why should it matter if these run down buildings that never get fixed up anyway get graffiti’d? 

Therein lies the issue. Art programs, both visual and performance based, are the first programs to be cut. Canvas ain’t cheap. Neither are the supplies. Much of the graffiti that takes place IS on buildings that are run down. The gov’t didn’t place any value on these properties and yet get pissy with dudes “vandalizing” their shit. You can’t have it both ways, ya dig. 

My father was a garment contractor in LA. In the late 80s, he owned the building where he had his factory. He thought it would be a cool idea to commission local graffiti artists, usually young Black and Latino men looking to stay out of trouble, to paint murals on his buildings. After all, he runs a garment design/manufacturing company, and creative signage is great advertising.
One day, he showed up to the building and the city just painted over the murals without permission or notice.
First, the city told him he couldn’t have graffiti art on HIS building because it brought down property value. After he complained, then they said: ok you can do this, but you need a permit. After he got the permit, then the city said: ok, but you can only use these artists.  Of course, these artists were all White graphic design students from USC, and of course they charged 3x more.
There is a prejudice against this type of art, and it’s racial.  Banksy vandalizes folks buildings all the time, and folks treat him like the Messiah. He ain’t doing nothing new that Black and Brown folks haven’t done for decades.

URGH
FUCKING TRUTH RIGHT HERE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

omfgjo:

cijithegeek:

kyssthis16:

yeezysdisciple:

youngbertreynolds:

thempress:

Maybe put it on a canvas instead of someone’s property, and we can all be happy.

who paying for these canvases or the art programs so these kids can have that? Why should it matter if these run down buildings that never get fixed up anyway get graffiti’d? 

Therein lies the issue. Art programs, both visual and performance based, are the first programs to be cut. Canvas ain’t cheap. Neither are the supplies. Much of the graffiti that takes place IS on buildings that are run down. The gov’t didn’t place any value on these properties and yet get pissy with dudes “vandalizing” their shit. You can’t have it both ways, ya dig. 

My father was a garment contractor in LA. In the late 80s, he owned the building where he had his factory. He thought it would be a cool idea to commission local graffiti artists, usually young Black and Latino men looking to stay out of trouble, to paint murals on his buildings. After all, he runs a garment design/manufacturing company, and creative signage is great advertising.

One day, he showed up to the building and the city just painted over the murals without permission or notice.

First, the city told him he couldn’t have graffiti art on HIS building because it brought down property value. After he complained, then they said: ok you can do this, but you need a permit. After he got the permit, then the city said: ok, but you can only use these artists.  Of course, these artists were all White graphic design students from USC, and of course they charged 3x more.

There is a prejudice against this type of art, and it’s racial.  Banksy vandalizes folks buildings all the time, and folks treat him like the Messiah. He ain’t doing nothing new that Black and Brown folks haven’t done for decades.

URGH

FUCKING TRUTH RIGHT HERE ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

(via sickelgaita)

Source: vandalslife
  1. itsjustamy reblogged this from epithode
  2. ladylokilove reblogged this from epithode
  3. baneofrain reblogged this from epithode
  4. epithode reblogged this from venndigo
  5. m4rtaaroverd reblogged this from aventurema
  6. terrifyingcandy reblogged this from satansgaypornblog
  7. madammayh3m reblogged this from makotokinoo
  8. my-dead-wonderland reblogged this from booksblanketsandtea
  9. pol-ski reblogged this from closet-sherlockian
  10. yesthatsverynicedear reblogged this from closet-sherlockian
  11. sorry-i-am-sher-locked reblogged this from insatiablebookgeek
  12. insatiablebookgeek reblogged this from closet-sherlockian
  13. closet-sherlockian reblogged this from superneoncat
  14. superneoncat reblogged this from booksblanketsandtea
  15. booksblanketsandtea reblogged this from mousew15a
  16. mousew15a reblogged this from boazpriestly
  17. hypnos11 reblogged this from maltliquorbreath
  18. deduce-his-heart reblogged this from strix-scandiaca
  19. itsnotjane reblogged this from preci0usj3m
  20. aventurema reblogged this from anaubeautifullittlefool
  21. passdajuice reblogged this from maltliquorbreath
  22. preci0usj3m reblogged this from russnj
  23. tdotle reblogged this from peekatjessiie
  24. peekatjessiie reblogged this from russnj
  25. braed reblogged this from madds98
  26. russnj reblogged this from maltliquorbreath
  27. liloreoboi reblogged this from maltliquorbreath
  28. maltliquorbreath reblogged this from crazyheazy
  29. crazyheazy reblogged this from radio-inactive
Call me Imp.

She/her/hers or they/them/theirs.

I am, in no particular order: 24, baeddeling, white, anglo, USian citizen, middle-class, able-bodied, poly, intersex, somewhat debilitated w/ depression but largely neurotypical, allistic, fat, singlet, sighted, hearing, unemployed, queer, genderfluid trans woman.

I tend to follow VERY few people and often have to unfollow people briefly or permanently when I just can't handle my dash.

If you aren't comfortable with me being on your blog / contacting you / etc, you can tell me and I'll back off. If it's hard to actually say it, you can send an ask just saying "red".

view archive



Feeling nervous about talking to me?

Tildes denote sarcasm

Notes About My Gender and Sex

...and my sexuality and romance

askbox